Southwest Airlines is drawing pushback after poking fun at passengers who stand up as soon as the seatbelt sign turns off after landing.
The Dallas-based carrier posted a message on Threads Tuesday, June 30, using a clapping-emoji format to drive its point home: “You π won’t π get π off π the π plane π faster π by π standing π up π .001 π seconds π after π the π seatbelt π sign π turns π off π.”
Threads commenters wasted no time clapping back at the post.
One commenter explained the urgency, writing, “IπhaveπaπconnectingπflightπthatπIπamπgoingπtoπbeπlateπtoπ.”
Another cited physical discomfort after a long flight, writing, “I’m π standing π up π because π I’ve π been π sitting π for π 5 π hours π and π I π need π to π stretch π my π legs! π.”
Others pointed to pressure from fellow passengers eager to disembark. “Gotta get my bag out and things ready to roll or everyone is waiting behind me angrily,” one commenter wrote, while another joked, “I feel attacked.”
The debate also touched on legroom and body size. One commenter argued taller travelers are unfairly penalized by cramped seating, saying they’ve had their calves “and lower legs go into spasms just 30 minutes after take off.”
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
Others invoked old-school airline etiquette. One commenter recalled announcements instructing passengers to “remain seated” so crews could “unload front to back,” adding that “common sense isn’t so common.” Another said the joke made a personal struggle harder, writing, “Thanks for making me dealing with my claustrophobia feel belittled.”
Some, however, sided with Southwest. One commenter suggested passengers without overhead luggage should be allowed to exit first, while another argued standing early actually speeds things up, recalling a flight where “90% of the delays” came from people fumbling with overhead bins after the doors opened.
This isn’t the first time the airline has found itself at the center of online debate. As Globe previously reported, Southwest recently made headlines for banning humanoid and animal-like robots from its flights, saying the lithium-ion batteries that power them pose a potential safety risk.